Choose Countries


Choose Scenarios
CNN
CNN
CNB
CNB
NPH
NPH

Scenario Difference

When using the results presented in the result viewer use the following citation:
Wråke, M., Karlsson, K., Kofoed-Wiuff, A., Folsland Bolkesjø, T., Lindroos, T.J., Tennbakk, B., Ogner Jåstad, E., Bosack Simonsen, M., Hagberg, M., Unger, T., Putkonen, N., Lehtilä, A. & Koljonen, T. (2021, September 7. ). Nordic Clean Energy Scenarios: Results Viewer. Nordic Energy Research. Retrieved from https://cleanenergyscenarios.nordicenergy.org

Developed by

TøkniEnergy Modelling Lab
If you are experiencing issues with the web tool please contact Kenneth Karlsson at The Energy Modelling Lab.

Choose Countries

Choose Scenarios
CNN
CNN
CNB
CNB
NPH
NPH

Scenario Difference
This function will calculate the difference in value between the blue and violet model results.
Developed by
Tøkni
Energy Modelling Lab
Welcome to the Nordic Clean Energy Scenarios results viewer

On this webpage you can explore the full modelling results from the Nordic Clean Energy Scenarios project, funded by Nordic Energy Research.

This web tool allows you to compare the results from three different scenarios developed by the project, view the effects on the energy system when applying additional assumptions to the model, and delve deeper into the full downloadable data provided in the statistics database and model results. For further instructions on how to use the web tool and get the most out of the presented results please see, How to use the results viewer tool. To learn more about the project and access the full report please see About Nordic Clean Energy Scenarios.

All NCES scenarios reach carbon neutrality by 2050, but technology choice, fuel consumption, and cost will adapt to the options available to change assumptions on the technological readiness of CCS technologies and limitations on bioenergy availability.

The results presented here are highly dependent on assumptions for technology developments and their potential availability, efficiency, and cost to just mention a few factors influencing future pathway developments. The many combinations of scenarios represented in this tool demonstrates the inherent uncertainty of using scenario modelling to predict the future Nordic energy system. What these results tell us is rather which solutions are competing, what synergies exists between low carbon energy technologies, and what factors their development is contingent on.

CARBON NEUTRAL NORDIC
Primary Energy Supply by Energy Source
Download as CSV
TWh
-50005001,0001,500
20152020202520302035204020452050
Biofuels
Coal
Electricity
Hydro
Natural gas
Oil
Others
Solar
Synthetic fuels
Waste
Wind
Nuclear
CO2 Emissions
Download as CSV
Mt CO2
-50050100150
20152020202520302035204020452050
Captured
Industry
Power and Heat
Residential
Transport
Upstream
Agriculture and Fishery
Internation transport
Service
Carbon Capture
Download as CSV
Mt CO2
0102030
20152020202520302035204020452050
BECCS
Biogas
Chemical
Hydropyrolysis
Waste
Industry
Power and heat
Upstream
DAC
Aluminium
Iron and steel
Final Energy Consumption by Energy Source
Download as CSV
TWh
05001,0001,500
20152020202520302035204020452050
Biofuels
Coal
District heat
Electricity
Natural gas
Oil
Solar
Synthetic fuels
Waste
Others
Final Energy Consumption by Sector
Download as CSV
TWh
05001,0001,500
20152020202520302035204020452050
Industry
Residential and commercial
Transport
Marginal Prices - CO2
Download as CSV
20152020202520302035204020452050
EUR15/t CO2
50100150200
SE
NO
DK
FI
IS